If appropriate, refer the reader to a figure or table to help enhance the interpretation of the data [either within the text or as an appendix].
For some studies, age may be an important factor.
When you organize information the same way in each of these related parts of your journal manuscript, we can quickly see how a certain result was interpreted and quickly verify the particular methods used to produce that result. Each paragraph should contain opinions in favour or against the topic discussed, critical evaluations, and learning points.
Here is some additional advice on particular problems common to new scientific writers. The first control should concentrate on the evaluation of the appropriateness of the logic of the manuscript, and its organization, and whether desired messages have been delivered or not. Foremost in your description should be the "quantitative" aspects of your study - the masses, volumes, incubation times, concentrations, etc.
If you discovered something unexpected, offer reasons. In line with the opinions of the referees, the manuscript can be critically reviewed, and perfected. While in the introduction you ask the research question and point out the hypothesis, in the discussion section you have to give answers to these questions and give arguments to prove or decline the suggestion.
Otherwise, follow the general order you reported the findings in the results section. The bacteria were then incubated at 37 C for 24 hr. Always make sure to describe any modifications you have made of a standard or published method.
As we stated above, the goal of your Discussion section is to answer the questions you raise in your Introduction by using the results you collected during your research.
I imagine the Results section like a dance with swords -- sometimes you are engaging your partner with the pointy end and sometimes you are gliding alongside them. In each research paper, discussion section plays a vital role.
On the other hand references should be promptly put in place while writing the manuscript, Sorting, and placement of the references should not be left to the last moment. Avoid repeatedly using a single sentence to relate a single action; this results in very lengthy, wordy passages.
Well, it is not easy to define a discussion section of a research paper as it is a complex and complicated part. Gfz berechnen beispiel essay Gfz berechnen beispiel essay best essay for college double indemnity essay sundiata an epic of old mali research papers vandemonian essays on friendship brand marketing dissertation pdf writer extreme sports pros and cons essay, persuasive essay about martin luther king jr importance of computer education essay in english essay about happiness in friends mr hyde and dr jekyll essay writing.
Therefore, the authors should go over the manuscript for at least three times after finalization of the manuscript based on joint decision. Use the same key terms, narrative style, and verb tense [present] that you used when when describing the research problem in your introduction.
Explain your opinion on why the unexpected results happened. Be sure to include the hypotheses you tested, controls, treatments, variables measured, how many replicates you had, what you actually measured, what form the data take, etc.
Always start with it, and you will never be bothered with a question of how to start a discussion section of a research paper. Address any limitations of your study and how relevant they are to interpreting your results and validating your findings.
Mention all unexpected concepts and patterns and give your own definition, connecting them with the whole research. The description of findings [results] and the interpretation of their significance [discussion] should be distinct sections of your paper.
Relatedly, reading and IMing at the same time may also not have stretched their abilities as multitaskers. Most often it is not.
When a discussion is too long, the reader often loses sight of the main message of the study. This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a result of your analysis.In this article, we’ll provide tips on how to write a strong Discussion section that best portrays the significance of your research contributions.
What’s the purpose of the Discussion section? In a nutshell, your Discussion fulfills the promise you made to readers in your Introduction. Most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title, Authors and Affiliation, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgments, and Literature Cited, which parallel the experimental process.
This is the system we will use. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by.
Oct 15, · Writing a discussion section in for a research paper. Recommendations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections.
Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this information. The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section. In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.
That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that.Download